Experimental studies of $^{10}$B($^7$Li, $^6$Li)$^{11}$B and $^{10}$B($^7$Li, $^6$He)$^{11}$C reactions

4 Jul 2025, 11:20
20m
90(3011) (Санкт-Петербургский Государственный Университет )

90(3011)

Санкт-Петербургский Государственный Университет

Oral Section 2. Experimental and theoretical studies of nuclear reactions. 1. Experimental and theoretical studies of nuclei

Speaker

Yuri Sobolev (JINR)

Description

The angular distributions of $^7$Li$_{g.s.}$, and $^6$He$_{g.s.}$, $^6$Li$_{g.s.}$, $^6$Li$_{3.56}$ reaction products of one-nucleon transfer in $^7$Li+$^{10}$B interaction were measured at $E_{7Li}$=58 MeV of U-400 @ FLNR JINR, Dubna. One of the aim of our studies was to compare the spatial dimension parameters of A=6 isobar triplet nuclei obtained in the direct one-step n , p-transfer reactions. The $^6$Li$^*_{3.56}$ is the IAS of $^6$He$_{g.s.}$. The angular distributions of $^{10}$B($^7$Li,$^6$He)$^{11}$C, $^{10}$B($^7$Li,$^6$Li)$^{11}$B and $^{10}$B($^7$Li,$^6$Li$^*_{3.56}$)$^{11}$B were measured under the same experiment for the first time. The analysis to derive the angular distributions was performed by using the finite-range coupled reaction channel approach. To microscopically derive the angular distributions concerning the 1$n$- and 1$p$- transfer processes some ingredients were needed, such as optical potential and spectroscopic amplitudes. For the optical potential in each partition the double- folding São Paulo potential [1,2] was used in both real and imaginary parts. Couplings with the first excited states of the projectile and target nuclei were explicitly included in the coupled equations scheme. The 1$n$- and 1$p$- spectroscopic amplitudes used in the single particle states were determined by shell model calculations, using the NuSHellX code [3].
Fig.1 shows the coupled scheme used in the one-nucleon transfer reactions calculation. A good agreement between theory and experiment was obtained for the elastic scattering and the transfer to the $^6$Li$_{g.s.}$(1$^+$) + $^{11}$B$_{g.s.}$(3/2$^-$) channel. On the other hand, the theory overestimates the data of one-neutron transfer populating the $^6$Li$^*_{3.56}$ (0$^+$) + $^{11}$B$_{g.s.}$(3/2$^-$). The same thing occurring with one-proton transfer populating the $^6$He$_{g.s.}$(0$^+$) + $^{11}$C$_{g.s.}$(3/2$^-$) channel. The reason is that the CRC calculations did not account for the breakup process of the $^6$Li and when it is left in its 0$^+$ excited state or the breakup effect on the ground state of the $^6$He nucleus. To show the relevance of the breakup process on the $^6$Li$_{3.56}$(0$^+$) excited state, we include the coupling between the g.s. and the 0$^+$ (3.56 MeV) from the single particle excitation approach as used in the CDCC calculation. So, a bin-state was set to describe the scattering between the $^4$He$_{g.s.}$ and the $p$-$n$ system inside the $^6$Li. To properly include this configuration, the $p$-$n$ valence particles were considered with spin $j$=0. The theoretical analysis when the breakup process of the $^6$Li$_{3.56}$(0$^+$) excited state is included in the CRC calculation gives a good description of the measured $^6$Li$_{3.56}$(0$^+$) + $^{11}$B$_{g.s.}$(3/2$^-$) channel. This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 24-22-00117. Brazilian authors were supported by CNP, FAPERJ, CAPES, and INCT-FNA (research project No. 464898/2014-5).
[1] L.C. Chamon, D. Pereira, M.S. Hussein, M.A. Cândido Ribeiro, D. Galetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5218 (1997).
[2] L. C. Chamon, B. V. Carlson, L. R. Gasques, D. Pereira, C. De Conti, M. A. G. Alvarez, M. S. Hussein, M. A. Cândido Ribeiro, E. S. Rossi, and C. P. Silva, Phys. Rev. C 66, 014610 (2002).
[3] NuShellX. www.garsington.eclipse.co.uk

Primary author

Co-authors

Sergei Stukalov (JINR) Dr Yuri Penionzhkevich (JINR) Nasurlla Burtebayev (Institute of nuclear Physics, Almaty city, Kazakhstan) Dr Sergei Goncharov (Lomonosov Moscow State University) Yury Gurov (JINR, MEPhI) Dr Andrey Danilov (National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute) Dr Alla Demyanova (National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute) Dr Sergey Dmitriev (National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute) Dr Jonas Leonardo (Instituto de Fisica Universidade Federal Fluminense Niteri) Dr Jesus Lubian (Instituto de Fisica Universidade Federal Fluminense Niteri) Dr Maulen Nassurlla (Institute of Nuclear Physics, Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan) Mr Viktar Starastsin (National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.